🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots added later and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible in which election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously backed the progressive now. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on the island who had a high participation. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. However no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from progressives come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.