🔗 Share this article

In a notable regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has reversed a prior decision that prevented viewers in Australia from accessing video footage of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The appeal was initiated by Elon Musk's company X, which contested an directive sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Background on the Original Classification Ruling

Following the death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in September, the eSafety commissioner petitioned the classification board to officially classify the circulating video. The board first determined the content was "unable to be classified", a rating that allowed the regulator to order platforms to restrict access to the videos for an Australian audience.

Elon Musk's company challenged the decision for two separate videos depicting the Kirk incident. It also appealed a similar ruling on another piece of footage—showing the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had likewise been deemed "refused classification".

The Platform's Case and Final Ruling

In its appeal, X contended that the footage in question contained only a short moment of violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the recording was low-quality and the camera quickly panned away from the individual to the bystanders.

X maintained the footage was not overly graphic, exploitative, or objectionable, stating it served as a neutral objective record of "a significant incident of public importance that prompted extensive public discourse". X drew a parallel between the video and the historic film of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

Most members of the classification panel concluded that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. The board suggested that a longer or clearer version with different editing could have resulted in a different ruling. Consequently, the panel revised the classification of the content to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

Some on the panel held a contrary view, arguing the video was "a shareable video for the likely purposes of entertainment and/or benefit (such as likes, shares, or views)". This view stated the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as the Kennedy video was made public long after the assassination, "after public sentiment around the matter had calmed".

Reactions to the Outcome

Posting on its global government affairs account, X welcomed the decision.

"X fought this decision to uphold freedom of expression and the critical nature of access to information about matters of public significance. We remain dedicated to safeguarding these fundamental values."

Representatives for the safety regulator also welcomed the ruling, but pointed out that the revised classification now implies platforms "must take steps to prevent R18+ material being displayed to Australians who are minors".

Recent Developments on Violent Content

Separately, the regulator has not issued take-down orders to platforms this week regarding graphic footage from the recent Bondi beach terror attack shared across social media. Officials commented that while the content were upsetting, they had not met the required standard for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to use warning labels and screens, such as blurring, on this material in line with their existing community guidelines.