🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed order, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to use a newly configured congressional map that is projected to include up to five additional GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three order, issued on Thursday, grants a request by the state to lift a lower court's ruling that had rejected the new map in November.

Court's Reasoning

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disrupting the fine equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in explaining its ruling.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely grouped voters based on their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the new maps. It had instructed the state to use the districts drawn after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Sharp Dissent

With a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's decision. She argued that it disrespected the work of the lower court, observing that its opinion was crafted by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan wrote in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Fight

The ruling comes amid a countrywide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican control. Usually, map-drawing happens after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a series of events among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that are estimated to yield several more GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have countered with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general praised the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures representation favorable to his party. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

On the other hand, Democratic representatives lamented the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

Another senior Democratic figure stated the court had yet again shredded its credibility by upholding a discriminatory map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.